I mean, there’s no competition for who makes it faster, right?

Which brings the question: What if slow is better?

What if don’t need to improve the efficiency BUT the efficacy?

What if it’s not about how fast / efficient / productive you get to a result, but about what kind of result you’re looking for?

As Rory Sutherland in this video says: “What if it’s not about the speed of the commute, but about the commute itself?“

What if we’re making the wrong questions?

And it’s not about speed (or growth)?

more to read